| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 4365 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
K. Channegowda , K. Rameshwarappa , M. R. Ravi and Ors. vs Karnataka Public Service Commission and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 284118]
|
SC |
2005 |
State of M.P. vs Rajesh
[LexDoc Id : 284117]
|
SC |
2005 |
Suresh Seth vs Commissioner, Indore Municipal Corpn. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 284078]
|
SC |
2005 |
State of M.P. vs Sheshrao
[LexDoc Id : 284077]
|
SC |
2005 |
State of M.P. vs Rakesh
[LexDoc Id : 284076]
|
SC |
2005 |
Center for Public Interest Litigation and Anr. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 284075]
|
SC |
2005 |
State of M.P. vs Dayanand Dohar
[LexDoc Id : 284073]
|
SC |
2005 |
CIT vs Madhurai Soft Drinks (P) Ltd.
-Refundable security deposits-The refundable security deposits that the assessee received from its retailers and selling agents, did not form a part of the assessee's sale transact [LexDoc Id : 280936]
|
Chennai HC |
2005 |
CIT vs Kantilal Prabhudas Patel
Appeal to High court-Addition in block assessment-Block-period: 1 April 1989 to 18 August 1999. The AO had made certain additions to income on basis of certain documents seized in search under s.132. [LexDoc Id : 332324]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2005 |
Coca-Cola (India) Ltd. vs JCIT
Business expenditure-Crates used for assessee’s products-AY 1996-97. The assessee, a manufacturer and seller of cold drinks, had engaged a company for manufacturing crates as per its specifications for distr [LexDoc Id : 299950]
|
ITAT (Pune) |
2005 |
CIT vs Zippers India
Business expenditure-Commission on sales vs Sales production expenses-AY 1985-86. The commission paid by the assessee on local as well as on export sales could not be disallowed as sales promotion expenses.
S. [LexDoc Id : 296392]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2005 |
Lalit Narain Singh vs The President, Religious Trust Board and another
[LexDoc Id : 295338]
|
HC (Patna) |
2005 |
Kalawati Devi vs Parmanand Mandal and another
[LexDoc Id : 295337]
|
HC (Patna) |
2005 |
CIT vs Beekay Engg. and Casting
Deduction: Export profits-Total turnover-The sales tax and the excise duty paid by the assessee could not be included in the turnover for computing deduction under s.80HHC of the Income Tax A [LexDoc Id : 294203]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2005 |
VXL Instruments Ltd. vs JCIT
Deductions: Income from export, Export turnover-Turnover of unit, Eligibility for exemption-AY 1996-97. The turnover of the assessee’s unit, which was eligible for exemption under s.10A of the Income Tax Act 1961, could not be included in the [LexDoc Id : 292426]
|
ITAT (Bangalore) |
2005 |
|
India Switch Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs ACI (India) Inc.
Rectification of register of members-Waiver off right- The petitioner’s claim for rectification of the register of members was not in consonance with its persistent demand for refund of th [LexDoc Id : 289437]
|
CLB Chennai |
2005 |
Baldev Singh Bajwa vs Monish Saini
[LexDoc Id : 288836]
|
SC |
2005 |
Aman Shiv Mandir Trust vs CIT
Registration of a charitable trust-Powers of CIT, Genuineness of objects -The charitable trust's application for registration could not be approved, as it had more than Rs.75 lakhs in deposits. However, for over 10 years it [LexDoc Id : 288770]
|
ITAT Chandigarh |
2005 |
Udai Plastic (P) Ltd. vs ITO
Capital Receipt-Amount received as Investment Subsidy-AY 1993-94. The amounts received by the assessee from the State government as Investment Subsidy after commencement of production was its capital rece [LexDoc Id : 288252]
|
ITAT Jabalpur |
2005 |
CIT vs D.N. Dosani
[LexDoc Id : 287274]
|
Gujarat HC |
2005 |
Vogel Medial International GMBH and Anr. vs Jasu Shan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 286172]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2005 |
Reference Under Article 317 (1) of the Constitution, S.S. Joshi, re
[LexDoc Id : 285017]
|
SC |
2005 |
Managing Director, TNSTC Ltd. vs K.I. Bindu and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 284874]
|
SC |
2005 |
Maina Devi vs ITO
Interest on borrowed capital-Loan used for purchasing capital asset, Deduction-The interest that the assessee was paying on a loan that she had utilized for the purchase of a shop, was allowable as deduction under s.36(1))(iii) a [LexDoc Id : 284623]
|
ITAT Jodhpur |
2005 |
Rajasthan State Financial Corpn. and Anr. vs Official Liquidator and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 284606]
|
SC |
2005 |
| |
| First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last |
| |
